|
I have been a member of several vertical discussion groups within LinkedIn for a while now and I do find them of occasional value, i.e. reaching out to a potential business partner, bouncing ideas off of peers.
Of course, I come across folks who are using these venues for less than "pure" networking functions; I see a fair number of members promoting their own services/products within discussion forums. I am not surprised: every medium of communication is going to be worked to the max for profit, that's human nature.
But I didn't expect this development that came through my email box this a.m. in the form of one of the regular email updates (I control how often) I get from administrators of these LinkedIn groups.
Today's email, from the administrator of the Social Media Marketing Group this a.m., reads in part:
"LinkedIn has... taken away my ability to send you the monthly email newsletter that I have produced in the past... I can no longer access the group's email list... [or] send you individual welcome letters or direct correspondence... I can't even view who is a member of this group, it is limited to seeing only 500, not the entire 15,000+"
Another complaint in Michael Crosson's cross and very long email is that LinkedIn has no reporting capabilities. "By disabling the email list download, I now have ZERO visibility into group performance reports that I used to have through my email management system. I can't tell how many people are unsubscribing, how many undeliverable emails there are, etc."
Bad Apples in the Barrel
The reason for these new actions by LinkedIn is, according to Crosson that "they claim they had to do this because some unscrupulous managers were building lists for spam... There are far better ways to deal with this issue."
Hmm, I wonder what those other ways would be? Just how sophisticated are LinkedIn's algorithms that they can detect good vs. bad email correspondence from group administrators?
Interestingly, Mr. Crosson is also cheesed off that LinkedIn's "forced advertising onto profiles and other pages" does not profit group administrators such as himself. "I don't make a dime from any of the work I put into LinkedIn."
What do YOU Think?
If you're a member of a LinkedIn group, how do you feel about the administrator not being able to send you a direct message?
Even if you're not a LinkedIn group member, do you think social networking should involve revenue-sharing for leaders/moderators of groups?
If this lockdown on spam by LinkedIn appropriate, or should we just accept the bad correspondence along with all the good content and sharing of info?
I want to know what you think! Please add your comments here. Leave a Comment (1 so far) |